Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

NO1 [K2

Y-DNA Haplogroup NO1 [K2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig NO1 [K2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 is an early branch within the broader K2 paternal lineage, positioned near the ancestral root of the NO clade that ultimately produced haplogroups N and O. Because it sits very close to this major phylogenetic split, NO1 is best understood as a deep Upper Paleolithic lineage associated with the ancestral population structure of northern Eurasia rather than with a single later historical population.

From a population genetics perspective, NO1 is significant because it helps illuminate the period before the differentiation of the two large descendant lineages that became highly successful in later prehistoric and historic expansions. The geographic and temporal placement of NO1 suggests an origin among northern Eurasian hunter-gatherer groups during the late Upper Paleolithic, when paternal lineages were diversifying across broad steppe-forest and northern continental environments.

Subclades

NO1 is an intermediate ancestral lineage rather than a widely attested terminal haplogroup in modern populations. Its most important descendants, in phylogenetic and demographic terms, are the lineages that later define:

  • Haplogroup N, which became especially important in northern Eurasia, including Uralic-associated populations and parts of Siberia and northeastern Europe.
  • Haplogroup O, which expanded dramatically in East Asia and later reached high frequencies across Southeast Asia.

Because NO1 is close to the point where these two major branches diverged, it is often used in discussions of deep ancestral structure rather than as a common present-day marker.

Geographical Distribution

Direct observations of NO1 itself are expected to be rare, but its ancestral background and descendant lineages are informative for its broader distributional context. The lineage is associated with North Eurasia and ancient northern populations, with later descendant signal concentrated across a very wide trans-Eurasian range through haplogroups N and O.

In terms of broader demographic relevance, NO1 is connected to:

  • Ancient northern Eurasian populations carrying early NO-related ancestry
  • Siberian populations, especially those linked to the diversification of haplogroup N
  • East Asian populations, where descendant haplogroup O later became widespread
  • Southeast Asian populations, where O achieved substantial frequencies
  • Uralic-associated populations of northern Eurasia through haplogroup N descendants

Historical and Cultural Significance

NO1 is not usually associated with a single archaeological culture in the way that younger, more geographically defined Y-lineages are. Instead, its significance lies in its role as a deep ancestral node that predates major expansions associated with later prehistoric population movements across Eurasia.

The descendants of NO1, especially N and O, are central to understanding the paternal history of:

  • Siberian forager and forest-zone populations
  • Uralic-speaking expansions in northern Eurasia
  • East Asian population history and subsequent demographic growth
  • Southeast Asian prehistoric and historic population formation

Thus, NO1 is important not because it defines one culture, but because it anchors one of the most consequential paternal splits in Eurasian prehistory.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 represents a very deep ancestral branch close to the origin of the major N–O split within the Y-chromosome tree. Its importance lies in its connection to the early paternal history of northern Eurasia and its role as the precursor background for two of the most widespread and historically influential lineages in Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis NO1 [K2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 NO1 [K2 Aktuell ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 NO1 [K ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 NO1 [ ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 NO1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 41 0
5 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

North Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 haplogroup NO1 is found include:

  1. Ancient northern Eurasian populations carrying ancestral NO-related lineages
  2. Siberian populations, especially those associated with downstream haplogroup N diversity
  3. East Asian populations, especially through the later expansion of haplogroup O
  4. Southeast Asian populations where haplogroup O reached high frequencies
  5. Uralic-associated populations in northern Eurasia through descendant N lineages

Regionale Präsenz

East Asia High
Southeast Asia High
Central Asia Low
Northern Asia / Siberia Low
Northern Europe Low
South Asia Low
Southeast Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~50k Jahre zurück

    Jungpaläolithikum

    Fortgeschrittene Werkzeuge, Kunst und kulturelle Vielfalt

  2. ~45k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe NO1 [K2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  4. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  5. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  6. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  7. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  8. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig NO1 [K2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu NO1 [K2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

China_Sitaimengguying_EN Early Buryat Lena River Culture Lokomotiv Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_N Shamanka Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.